South African aluminium producers face a critical decision: use EU default emission values or invest in actual emissions verification. This guide helps you make the right choice.
For South African aluminium producers, the choice between using EU default emission values and actual verified emissions for CBAM purposes is one of the most financially significant decisions they will make in 2026.
The EU default emission value for aluminium is 12.4 tCO₂/t (including the 10% markup penalty for 2026, rising to 30% from 2028).
When to use default values:
For most South African aluminium smelters using Eskom grid electricity (actual emissions ~13.9 tCO₂/t), the default value approach results in lower CBAM liability than using actual emissions.
If you can demonstrate that your actual embedded emissions are below 12.4 tCO₂/t, you can reduce your CBAM liability by using verified actual emissions.
When actual emissions might be below the default:
Example: Smelter with 40% renewable PPA
At 100,000 tonnes of EU exports, this represents a saving of €24.8 million per year — a compelling business case for renewable energy investment.
To use actual emissions, you must:
The verification cost is typically R200,000–R500,000 per year for a large smelter — a small fraction of the potential CBAM savings from lower actual emissions.
| Scenario | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Actual emissions > 12.4 tCO₂/t (no renewable PPA) | Use default values |
| Actual emissions < 12.4 tCO₂/t (renewable PPA in place) | Use actual verified emissions |
| Considering renewable PPA | Model the CBAM saving as part of the PPA business case |
| Uncertain about actual emissions | Commission a preliminary emissions assessment |
Use the CBAM Calculator [blocked] to model both scenarios for your specific situation.